![]() Though it may leave a gap in the 3rd to 6th gears which are usually the sweet spots for my riding, at least on my current bike/usual trails. Will the greater difference in gear jump be an inherent problem with the shifter/derailleur or will simply adjusting it solve the problem? I'm guessing the same shifters/derailleurs can handle differing cassette gearing sizes?Ĭhanging last two cogs would leave me with a wider spread giving the climbing i need and keeping the top end. Is that even an option? I'm guessing the individual cogs of a cassette can be changed? If the 30T chainring isn't too far off, would it make any sense to swap out one or two of the cassette cogs instead? Dump the 36 for a 40 and whatever the next is use the 36 instead? The 34:34 (current, 2nd chainring) is too much for my strength/weight. That's ignoring the circumference difference between 29x2.4 and 29x3.0. It remains one of the best bikes I’ve ever ridden.Īlex Strickland is the Editor-in-Chief of Adventure Cyclist, and he recently upgraded the cassette on his Stache to an 11–46T.If I'm looking at it correctly a 24:34 (current bike) is not too far from a 30:36 (Stache 5), though 2 teeth in the chainring one direction or another may make a decent difference in feel/use. The 1120 is a fascinating bike, but my love for the Stache is undiminished. I’m always in the camp of buying a bike for the type of riding you do most rather than overcompensating for the outlier (this is very much in opposition to the buy-a-4x4-in-case-it-snows-once-a-year school of thought). Internal derailleur and dropper post routing. The bike is part of Trek s Stache range of mountain bikes. It sports 29' wheels, is priced at 3,800 USD, comes in a range of sizes, including 15.5 in., 17.5 in., 19.5 in., 21.5 in., has RockShox suspension and a SRAM drivetrain. But I’d rather have a mountain bike that rips trails and can be pressed into duty as an overnight machine than a bikepacking rig that feels just a little, well, less on my favorite singletrack. The 2019 Trek Stache 9.7 is an Cross Country Carbon mountain bike. So where does that leave me? Given the chance, would I shell out for my beloved Stache 5 again or pony up for Trek’s prototype-done-good 1120? The latter is a pure bikepacker, and the front rack especially is nearly reason enough to lean toward the gray-and-orange beast. Thanks! Check your inbox for a welcome email. My wrists also seem to prefer the flat bar angle, though many riders have a different experience. While the swoopy bars and upright position were comfortable for dirt road miles, I’d gladly swap to standard flat bars and trade a bit of comfort for more control in varied terrain. ![]() The Bontrager bars check all the boxes on my personal “dislike” list, and certainly each rider’s mileage may vary. That was enough to convince me to remove the racks for any day ride - no hardship since they mount directly and didn’t require futzing with spacers and such, but still a minor inconvenience. For comparison, my rigid Stache, with an aftermarket dropper and upgraded carbon bars, tips the scales at closer to 26.5 lbs. ![]() I bought the bike second hand and the headset was the only place I havent looked into yet. It is still rotating but with noticeable resistance. The 1120 is a fascinating bike, but my love for the Stache is undiminished.Īside from the slight manufacturing issue, the big rub is that despite being alloy, the racks add nearly four pounds to an already beefy bike, bringing the weight to a hair under 32 lbs. I was packing up my bike yesterday, took out the headset bearings and discovered that the bottom one was almost completely rusted. Up front, the direct-mount attachment to the fork crown was fantastic, and I’d gladly retrofit the front rack to my current bike if I could (I can’t). Our test model’s rear rack was a little twisted, something Trek assured us was limited to a few media demo bikes, but other than a little tire rub when cornering while loaded, the rack wasn’t a problem. ![]() In the rear, clearance for the included dropper post is appreciated, and Trek’s harness system for accommodating 8-liter drybags is clever, if low-tech. Those racks, unique to the bike, are a mixed bag.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |